Short debate with some "thinkers" who give versions of how to unite the Democratic Party

Many "thinkers" are coming out about how the Democratic Party is made and resurrected, but which are more similar to what the communist parties in the west used to be "renewed" as the "reconstructed" communist party, the "refounded" communist party, etc., any A political "thinker" says that a "council of the wise" should be listened to, which is what Edi Rama said before about the Socialist Party; someone else speaks of a collegial leadership of the Democratic Party, a model used by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union after Stalin's death. The "pulpit" or "reestablishment" of the DP is a practice used by the communist parties to preserve the Marxist-Leninist ideology against revision and revisionism, that is, to prevent deviations from Marxism-Leninism and leadership. So even the "re-establishment" of the DP is sought by its former supreme leader and all others, those who, as "conservatism" or as a re-establishment, seek to keep the DP in their clutches, as property and means of ruling lifetime of DP by them and their relatives, just like the communist-conservative regime in North Korea. So, these philosophers show that the Democratic Party should come together as an amalgam of failed ideas and experiences, only for the purpose of these thinkers and those who stand behind them to drag and hold the Democratic Party hostage for narrow personal interests. The Democratic Party is actually the institutional one which has a healthy core at the head such as Basha, Alibeaj, Bejko, Pampuri, etc., but also the base, mainly the youth, who believe in Basha and the new democratic and pro-American political elite.