BREAKING NEWS

SMI crumbles, members pass with PS! Monika Kryemadhi receives the "strong" blow before the elections

SMI crumbles, members pass with PS! Monika Kryemadhi receives the
x

Opinion / Editorial

The grotesque of a society that claims democracy, when it has no party!

The grotesque of a society that claims democracy, when it has no party!

The recent appearance of elections within a party began the arrogance of justifying not having a candidacy in front of the one who is actually a co-owner of the party. The internal democracy of the Albanian parties is also the main culprit of the lack of democracy in Albania. State poorly built and administered. Or its virtuality in implementation, which leads to the lack of creation of the pillars of precisely democracy in a state governed by the rule of law which are the legislature, the executive and the justice system. Albanian society does not have democracy, but the "grotesque claim" for democracy. Creating political monsters on the party is our "feudal politics". We have not yet formed the urban political consciousness. We are not urban in politics, but by chance we happened to be political feudal lords resembling the direction of the country's two great pashas in the late 17th and early 18th centuries. Some of today's political feudal lords are like "Ali Pasha Tepelena" but not with his ruling talent (except Enver who had the murderous talent) and others are somewhat similar to the dynasty of the great Pashallëk of Shkodra and why they are never excellent as Karamahmud Pasha and Mustafa Pasha Bushatlliu. Based on this similarity, this society has built political parties in the late 20th and early 21st century. Your face does not turn black, your face does not blush, why do they behave like rulers and feudal lords over the parties and then over the state formed by this model of parties in Albania. And the majority of the population is not impressed even by this tragic and funny moment. Imagine that they are competing with themselves. The only party that once competed politically was Nano's SP, but even this kind of race brought him out in front of Berisha who was the ruler and controlled the party, when the Socialists made gam gam gam in imitation of internal democracy. Dr. Berisha was not impressed that he was unbeatable and unaffordable. On the contrary, he behaved like a great, excellent feudal lord over the party, omniscient, and those below as "his subjects" subject to the ruler in the party. Today, Edi Rama is not at all impressed that he is uncompetitive in the party and that there is no one there who can face him. Yes vanity and narcissism at the same time. They enjoy this as much as the Albanian oriental feudal lords of the last 250 years in Albania. Biles Rama and shawls are like them. When confronted with Nano he was so "modern" in democracy and imitation with him. But it was clear that he would no longer lead the SP in this way, because of course those down there would then take him on his feet thanks to the downward rejection of internal democracy. Yes, because it is not only denied from above, but also rejected by the sejms below. They are always with the principle - whoever has the castle, is also their ruler and they are with him, against everyone else with a different opinion. Whereas this society accepts this Albanian feudal political stupidity, without any hope of having a normal democracy within the parties. Today Albania does not have a single political party in its spectrum to be - democratic. There are only party properties and shareholders of the majority of shares in the party. How can it be accepted that the SMI is a democratic party when it is a property party, belongs to the two founding and leading leaders who are Ilir Meta and his wife. Realistically it is their party and by no means in the 21st century can it behave as democratic because that is how it is built. And there is no shame in not behaving like a democrat because there is no other in this society who will not understand where the evil of not behaving in a democracy of this country comes from. How can it be called democratic The Democratic Party that does not hold democratic elections within it, that expels people, persecutes a large majority of its founders and creators, that declares enemies within itself and that does not implement statutes and why it says I have a statute. That does not create as it should, the spirit of an internal democracy where the mayor emerges from free elections and without indications and catapults of individuals and the removal of those with records and contributions either in the suburbs, or outside at all. How can it be called a democratic party when the "brother-in-law" makes the "poetic" inspiration of the cadre and internal politics in the party? How can the party be divided into two souls outside the normal left, which are the Renaissance of Rama and Veliaj and the SP of the legacy from November 8, 1941 until today? Where there is no race for mayor (forums are in vain at all) and this is because no one intends and does not dare to stand up to who he is, impoverishing and distorting the foundation of internal democracy in a voluntary union of people. Who is the democratic party the party of the late Sabri Godo who made the departure to be replaced by a person who will never leave the mayor as long as he lives. Or Mr. Milo's party, or the popular joke party like Ndoka as the Christian Democrat inspiration party? Or the party of the only former democrat like Mr. Shehu? Or the citizen's lunch party that defends human rights Dule? Or that of the Chams led by a former socialist today nationalist? Or should we hope that there will be no party other than the feudal lord Mr. Patozi and others already created at this time. Who will have a democratic party, Mrs. Topalli? Why is anyone there to oppose it "face to face" in alternative terms? So who is the party that implements internal democracy so that we can be confident that they will implement democracy when they take political power? Which party? This is grotesque and for that matter they are clear and out. Albania behaves as if it were a democracy, but it has no basic connection with democracy, because there is no democratic party in its pluralistic political spectrum. Yes, of course, they speak as "democrats", but they are completely comic feudal lords in the system where the medemek powers are divided and there is a fourth power or the media power that often refreshes them. They have bought everything (billions) and have political affairs everything and we must believe that we are in a democracy enforced to the law. Yes this is really grotesque, incredible and comic. We have the democracy of relations between Berisha, Basha, Rama and Meta and the others who bring you through their pants. If they find a hole they will come out, if they do not find it, they will stay there until the pants fall off on their own. This is an allegory, but I like to call our democracy grotesque. And this grotesque is in the philosophical basis of our society still left as in the time of the pashas and as much in the time of dictatorship. Only in their own ways do they understand the desolation of democracy. A part of this society (mainly the militants of the idea I am with the one who has the fortress) reject the implementation of democracy. They do not want it and why do they remember that they are operating in a democracy. And this is certainly a misfortune. Rama and Meta and the others who bring you through their pants. If they find a hole they will come out, if they do not find it, they will stay there until the pants fall off on their own. This is an allegory, but I like to call our democracy grotesque. And this grotesque is in the philosophical basis of our society still left as in the time of the pashas and as much in the time of dictatorship. Only in their own ways do they understand the desolation of democracy. A part of this society (mainly the militants of the idea I am with the one who has the fortress) reject the implementation of democracy. They do not want it and why do they remember that they are operating in a democracy. And this is certainly a misfortune. Rama and Meta and the others who bring you through their pants. If they find a hole they will come out, if they do not find it, they will stay there until the pants fall off on their own. This is an allegory, but I like to call our democracy grotesque. And this grotesque is in the philosophical basis of our society still left as in the time of the pashas and as much in the time of dictatorship. Only in their own ways do they understand the desolation of democracy. A part of this society (mainly the militants of the idea I am with the one who has the fortress) reject the implementation of democracy. They do not want it and why do they remember that they are operating in a democracy. And this is certainly a misfortune. but I like to call our democracy grotesque. And this grotesque is in the philosophical basis of our society still left as in the time of the pashas and as much in the time of dictatorship. Only in their own ways do they understand the desolation of democracy. A part of this society (mainly the militants of the idea I am with the one who has the fortress) reject the implementation of democracy. They do not want it and why do they remember that they are operating in a democracy. And this is certainly a misfortune. but I like to call our democracy grotesque. And this grotesque is in the philosophical basis of our society still left as in the time of the pashas and as much in the time of dictatorship. Only in their own ways do they understand the desolation of democracy. A part of this society (mainly the militants of the idea I am with the one who has the fortress) reject the implementation of democracy. They do not want it and why do they remember that they are operating in a democracy. And this is certainly a misfortune.